- Home
- Who we are
- How you can help
- Contact Us
- Videos
- Where we are today - 2021
- How the HD started
- That weird federal law
- The vote against the HD
- Why neighbors are upset
- Demolition obsession
- Most say "no" to district
- How many demolitions?
- Eastmoreland teardowns
- Why good people go bad
- Too many changes in HD
- ENA's HD strategy
- Elderly targeted
- Those trusts! - explained
- What about new owners?
- ENA meetings go secret
- The push poll that wasn't
- Small meeting to go ahead
- ENA spending on the HD
- ENA gets drone to spy
- Eastmoreland demographics
ENA spent big for HD application
The ENA inked a contract with consultant AECOM for nearly $50k
In April 2016, a consulting firm was engaged to write and manage the historic district application for a fee of $48,600. The first draft of the nomination form was submitted to the National Park Service in November 2016.
The ENA has paid over $70,000 to date (September 2021) on HD-related efforts that have been disclosed. Interestingly, all issues of ENA newsletters for the years 2014-2018 are missing from its web site. ENA financial statements are often reported in the newsletters.
The draft of the nomination was presented to the neighborhood in a meeting in January 2017.
